This was one of the many headlines doing media rounds after the CBI announced the evidence was inconclusive. 5 years later, the statement remains intact.
Everyone with an opinion has written or spoken about this infamous case...and why not...this mystery has played out like a soap opera with so many twists and turns that gripped the attention of most households if not all.
I wanted to wait till after the fuss was over. Being an erstwhile crime reporter, i knew it wouldn't last more than 2 or max 3 days. And as one of the many journalists who covered the case in the summer of 2008...a simple case that later turned out to be India's biggest who-dun-it...I too have an opinion.
There are 2 sides to every coin...but we, being riveted beings, can see only one side at a time. and it is this irony that amuses me the most.
When the Noida police arrested the father, we believed it was him. (when i say 'we' i mean most people) Then, when the CBI took over and named 3 other house-helps as the accused, we partially believed it. Partial because there was a parallel theory doing the rounds - How can the parents not know or hear anything? What are their political connections? Are they influential enough to have 3 poor people framed
I vividly remember Krishna's (one of the 3 accused servants) crying face saying "main sai baba ki kasam kha ke khta hoon ki maine kuch nahi kiya" (I swear on god I am innocent). It didn't look like a face that was lying. On the other hand, a stone faced mother talking about Aarushi's favourite dish on a news channel, certainly did.
Sadly, ours is a country that is mostly ruled by emotion and not common sense. When the 3 servants were taken into custody, topic of discussion in newsrooms and living rooms was how people with money get away with things while its the poor that pay the price for their deeds. The sympathy lay with the poor.
And today when the parents are convicted, the sympathy lies with them. Even though it comes from the same people who accepted the initial police theory and hurled blames and abuses at them.
One fact in both situations still remains the same - no concrete evidence to convict either.
It is also quite clear after reading the judgment that the evidence is merely circumstantial. What I can't understand is that what possible motive does the Noida police or the CBI team have to frame the Talwar's. Wouldn't it b easier for them to pin it on the servants.
Let's look at the mentality of our law enforcement agencies. I was aghast when I read Aarushi's aunt describe the line of questioning the policemen had taken. Why was she reading the book 3 mistakes of my life? what mistakes had she made? what is a slumber party? why did she not want adults around at her slumber party?
For god's sake, if not humanity's, we live in the 21st century. Whose fault is it that uneducated people question the lifestyle of the educated. Are the Talwar's paying the price for being educated...coz that is what 'elite' would mean in their case.
I had been naïve enough to buy the police theory as well. But I am also an open minded, educated person who understands reason. Today I say I do not know who committed the murders. Simply because there is no proof! Just because the father admits to drinking at parties, our respectable court decides that he must have consumed alcohol that night as well. How deranged our judicial system must be to make a statement like that. I presently have half a bottle of whisky, rum and wine in my house. Surely I too must be capable of a heinous crime.
Aren't we a country that believes innocents should not be punished even if the guilty go free? The parents had a chance to go free. CBI had closed the report. Why would the parents want the investigation to be opened if they were guilty?
I am not pronouncing a verdict as i simply do not know. How can anyone know when the evidence in the case was either destroyed or tampered with. But no one admits to not knowing. From courts to the CBI and from news organisations to the masses, everyone has theories for the sole purpose of intellectual masturbation. The simple truth is that no one can know for sure (except the killer(s)) as the story goes both ways.
So shouldn't the parents remain innocent until proven otherwise? how can the court overrule its own principles?
One good thing that has come out of this case is that it will force us to think many times before playing around with our archaic law system in any way. God forbid if I ever got on the wrong side of this law and tried to get something so precious, elusive and unattainable in today's time...Justice.